top of page

Fats, Oils, and Grease

The Science

Metabolic Pathways of FOG Removal w/ In-Pipe Technology

Fats are esters of fatty acids and glycerol which are normally solid at room temperature. Oils are esters of fatty acids and glycerol which are normally liquid at room temperature. Grease is a general term used to describe a soft or melted animal fat or a lubricant (Campbell, 1999). Collectively they are referred to as fats, oils, and grease (FOG).

Large amounts of FOG are disposed into wastewater on a continuous basis particularly where there are high numbers of restaurants or food processing facilities. When FOG enters the wastewater it tends to congeal within the piping system and at lift stations and the headworks, creating flow problems and odors due to the FOG hydrophobicity and poor solubility in water and from the oxidation of the organic FOG compounds (putrification). Some microbes are particularly useful in biodegrading most of the FOG discharged into the wastewater.

Clogged Pipe

Degradation of FOG begins with the breakdown of the complex molecule by extracellular enzymes produced by microorganisms. Microorganisms produce many different classes of lypolytic enzymes including true lipases and esterases (e.g., carboxylesterase). Lipases display the most activity towards water-insoluble long-chain triglycerides while esterases degrade smaller molecules that are at least partially soluble in water. Lipase activity depends on the presence of a substrate/water interface while esterase activity follows the Michaelis-Menten kinetic reaction where maximum activity is reached long before the solution becomes substrate saturated (Jaeger et al., 1994). Bacteria as a group have great diversity in the activity levels of the lipases and/or esterases that they produce. Some of the lipases and esterases are very broad in their substrate activity while others have preferences for specific fatty acids. For example, the Bacillus subtilis lipase attacks fatty acids with chain lengths of 8 carbons found in the 1, 3-positions of a triglyceride while the Staphylococcus aureus lipase has a very broad range of substrate degradation capabilities (Thomson, 1999).

Other compounds produced by microorganisms and useful in the process of biodegradation of FOG are biosurfactants which are excreted into the environment surrounding the microorganism. The physiological role that biosurfactant production plays has been speculated to be facilitation of the growth of microorganisms on water-immiscible substrates by reducing the interfacial tension and making the substrate more bioavailable (Maier, 2003). Some of the bacteria genera reported to produce surfactants include Pseudomonas, Rhodococcus, Mycobacterium, Nocardia, Flavobacterium, Corynebacterium, Clostridium, Acinetobacter, Thiobacillus, Bacillus, Serratia, Arthrobacter, and Alcanivorax (Maier, 2003). The type of biosurfactant produced is genus and sometimes even species specific.


After the FOG has been exposed to biosurfactant and degraded by enzymes, the fatty acids and glycerol are consumed by other microorganisms that are capable of utilizing them (pseudomonads, Acinetobacter, various bacilli, and E. coli) (Gottschalk, 1986). The fatty acids are oxidized to acetyl-CoA via a pathway called β-oxidation. If the fatty acid has an even number of carbon atoms, then the entire chain is degraded to acetyl-CoA. If the fatty acid chain is an odd-chain fatty acid, then the last fragment is propionyl-CoA which is converted to acetyl-CoA through a variety of possible pathways. β-oxidation of fatty acids, in combination with the tricarboxylic acid cycle and respiratory chain, provides more energy per carbon atom than any other energy source (Zubay, 1996).

In some sections of collection systems, FOG is very difficult to metabolize. In these situations, a specialized proprietary mix of aerobic vegetative bacteria specialized for hydrocarbon digestion is added to the treatment process. Although these organisms require an aerobic environment to live, sufficient oxygen is in the wastewater in wet wells to allow them to assist in breaking down FOG at point of entry. Also, they can survive short periods of oxygen deprivation by using nitrate as an alternative electron acceptor. These organism are common soil bacteria that are adapted to living in low nutrient conditions, or r-strategists.  An ‘r strategist’ relies on high reproductive rates for continued survival within the community. A ‘r strategist’ microorganism is one that, through rapid growth rates, takes over and dominates situations in which resources are temporarily abundant (Andrews and Harris, 1986). A ‘r strategist’ (e.g., Aspergillus, Penicillium, Pseudomonas, and Bacillus) can rapidly colonize and degrade large, readily available organic matter in a short period of time.

  • See More
    Andrews JH, Harris RF. 1977. r- and K-Selection and Microbial Ecology. Adv Microbial Ecol. 9:99-147. Atlas, RM and Bartha R. 1987. Microbial Ecology: Fundamentals and Applications. Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Co. Menlo Park CA USA. Castignetti, D. and Hollocher T. 1982. Nitrogen Redox Metabolism of a Heterotrophic, Nitrifying-Denitrifying Alcaligenes sp. from Soil. Appl Environ Microbiol. 44(4): 923- 928. Fenchel TM and Jorgensen BB. 1977. Detritus Food Chains of Aquatic Ecosystems: The Role of Bacteria. Adv Microbiol Ecol. 1:1-58. Gottschalk, G. 1986. Bacterial Metabolism, 2nd edition. Springer-Verlag, Inc. NY. Gray TR, Parkinson D (editors). 1968. The Ecology of Soil Bacteria. University of Toronto Press, Canada. 681 pages. Kuenen JG and Gottschal JC. 1982. Competition among Chemolithotrophs and Methylotrophs and their interactions with Heterotrophic Bacteria in Microbial Interactions and Communities Volume 1, pp 153-186. La Riviera JWM. 1977. Microbial Ecology of Liquid Waste Treatment. Adv Microbiol Ecol. 1:215-259. Priest, F. 1977. Extracellular Enzyme Synthesis in the Genus Bacillus. Bacteriol Rev. 41(3): 711-753. Richardson DJ, Watmough NJ. 1999. Inorganic Nitrogen Metabolism in Bacteria. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 3:207-219. Richardson DJ, Wehrfritz JM, Keech A, Crossman LC, Roldan MD, Sears HJ, Butler CS, Reilly A, Moir JW, Berks BC. 1998. The diversity of redox proteins involved in bacterial heterotrophic nitrification and aerobic denitrification. Biochem Soc Trans. 26:401-408. Robertson LA, Cornelisse R, Zeng R, Kuenen JG. 1989. The effect of thiosulfate and other inhibitors of autotrophic nitrification on heterotrophic nitrifiers. Antonie van Leeuwen. 56:301-309. Roth D. and Lemmer H. 1994. Biofilms in Sewer Systems- Characterization of the bacterial biocenosis and its metabolic activity. Wat. Sci. Tech. 29(7): 385-388. Seviour RJ, Mino T, Onuki M. 2003. The Microbiology of Biological Phosphorus Removal in Activated Sludge Systems. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 27: 99-127. Strous M and Jetten MSM. 2004. Anaerobic Oxidation of Methane and Ammonium. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 58: 99-117. Tchobanoglous G, Burton FL, Stensel HD. 2003. Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse/Metcalf & Eddy 4th edition. Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited. New York USA. Verstraete W and Alexander M. 1972. Heterotrophic Nitrification by Arthrobacter sp. J Bacteriol. 110(3): 955-961.
bottom of page